Tuesday, November 25, 2014

The biology of heterosexual desire and "family behavior" implies a lot about immutability of sexual orientation


Louann Brizendene has a detailed op-ed on CNN, “Love, sex and the male brain”, here. She makes a lot of blunt observations.  During the teen years, men’s testosterone level rises 20-fold, causing them to “notice” female body parts and desire their reproductive potential.  But once a man has a pregnant partner, pheromones from her cause his testosterone levels to drop so that he will become more domesticated and help build the nest.

What happens if he is in a household with a pregnant woman with someone else’s child?   (Is that why Sonny loses his chest hair on “Days of our Lives” when living with Will and Gabi, and their biological daughter?  Remember, Sonny delivered the daughter in an emergency. Now that Will is gone for a while in LA, Sonny’s chest hair grew back.)

What happens to professional baseball and football players if their testosterone levels drop during a domestic cycle?  Does that help explain losing streaks?

Normally, in the past, most gay men did not have pregnant female partners to develop the testosterone loss – an observation that the Family Research Council cited in opposing gay marriage.
With things explains so biologically in this article, what does happen in the development of gay men? 

Also, boys differentiate in strength and athletic performance even before teen years, before the hormone levels shoot up. 
  
Further, girls mature biologically sooner than boys.  But what happens with lesbians? 

It seems that hormonal development is indeed biological, yet the purposes one attaches it to can be personally chosen, and can reflect many other prejudices.  


 Second picture: the aliens spaceships from my novel "Angel's Brother".  A movie maybe? 

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Former Navy Seal Kristin Beck speaks to Arlington Gay Alliance about transgender ban, and national security


This evening I went to a Thanksgiving potluck held in the auditorium at the Central Library in Arlington VA, held by AGLA, the Arlington Gay and Lesbian Alliance, and listened to transgendered former Navy Seal Kristin Beck speak.  I apologize for having to leave a bit early to go to another event in northern VA at Tyson’s Corner. 


I see I have a report of an interview by Anderson Cooper of Kristin here on June 15, 2013 on the TV blog. I have a review of the CNN film “Lady Valor: The Kristin Beck Story" on the movie reviews blog Sept. 4, 2014.  (I had to correct the first name spelling to end in “in” just now; my apologies.) 

It’s well to remember that the lifting of “don’t ask don’t tell” did not affect the ban on transgendered individuals from the military, as covered on Scott Peck’ radio program way back in 1993 when he interviewed a former enlisted person in Naval Intelligence who left the uniformed services with the sex change but got a similar job as a civilian.

Kristin talked about the absolute standards of fitness in the Navy Seal program, and actually transgender identity did not interfere with that.  Kristin talked about Alan Turning (in the upcoming film “The Imitation Game”).

Kristin also talked about difficulties with the publisher of her book, titled “Warrior Princess: A U.S. Navy Seal’s Journey to Coming Out Transgender”, the publisher being Advances Press, which she said controls the rights to her book.  (Apparently that did not interfere with CNN’s making the film.) I went to Amazon, and found it a bit pricey in hardcover and paper, with a long waiting period for paper.  It’s also on Kindle.  But I went ahead and ordered the hardcover just now and gave her some business.

There was a book exchange for the Library ("it's free") at the potluck.  See my contribution. It's in good company. 
  


Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Pope Francis seems to backtrack on equality for LGBT people, as he talks about complimentarity as anthropological fact


Pope Francis seemed to backtrack a bit on what had sounded like very supportive statements for LGBT people a few weeks ago.  The Independent (from the UK) is reporting that the Pope, at a three-day conference on the family at the Vatican, spoke about heterosexual marriage, with its biological complementarity, as an “anthropological fact” that is quite permanent and that should not be disregarded by “temporary” trends in history.  The link to the story by Adam Withnall is here
  
The Pope also said that children have a right to grow up in homes with a mother and father.  The logical problem is, of course, what happens to an orphan when that isn’t available?  Russia is removing children from homes of gay couples, and yet in Russia most children who grow up in orphanages become criminal.   Is “Will and Sonny” preferable to no family at all?  No one seems to tackle this question. You can also extend the question to singles’ adoption, of course.
  
The Pope also said that people are giving up on marriage as a public commitment.  Did he mean just heterosexuals?  He also talked about increased personal freedom along with the lessening of expectation of people marrying and having children, but the indirect result has been felt among the world’s poorest and most vulnerable.
  
The “marriage equality” question tests logic, and mathematics is rather relentless regardless of what universe you live in.  If gay couples have less legal standing and are particularly discouraged from parenthood (especially adoption), then they will tend to have less responsibility for others – until they face their own eldercare obligations (which is what happened to me).  If they become prosperous and spend their resources on themselves instead of raising children, they will tend to contribute to increasing inequality, which strains social stability, even to the point of becoming a national or societal security issue.  But of course, we can say the same thing about economic schism among families – Michael Moore’s “I’ve got mine” thing. 
  
  

In the video clip from Oct 2013, the Pope said to married couples, “You must ‘waste time’ with their children, so they can realize that love is always free.”  Oh, here we go, “It’s free.”  Where have I heard that before?  

Sunday, November 16, 2014

Blood donation policy committee recommends lifting automatic MSM ban for one year abstinence period


The U.S. Committee on Blood and Tissue Safety has voted 16 to 2 to end its 31-year policy on accepting blood or tissue donations from men who have had sex with men (MSM) since 1977.  The new guidelines would be predicated on a one-year period of abstinence as well as negative tests.  A story by Lou Chibbaro, Jr. in the Washington Blade Nov. 14 is here.   The story has an odd picture of a hairless forearm with intrusive tape.
  
It’s not clear if this could apply to plasma donations (such as if someone had recovered from Ebola).  It does not appear that participation in a gay marriage arrangement would matter if abstinence had not been practiced for one year.
  
When I was working for USLICO in the 1990s, in Arlington, which specialized in life insurance for military officers, I was embarrassed when approached about blood donation drives by an insensitive coworker running the recruitment.  

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Blade reports the gay angle of the Georgetown ricin case -- and it is double-edged; also, a valuable disco souvenir


As I was leaving Town Danceboutique in the wee hours this AM after very lively disco night given the cold wave (which was not as pronounced in town as “out here”) I picked up a Washington Blade and was shocked to see the story by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.  (link )about the sentencing of former Georgetown Student Danny Milzman to a year and a day in prison, and 400 hours of community service tutoring disadvantaged youths in math – the later sounding like a provision that could help him return to college some day.
  
Dr. Phil is always saying that even at 19 the brain is not fully formed to see around corners.
  
I was not aware that Milzman is gay, nor that Thomas Lloyd, the resident assistant who called university police after clumsy emergency response from the University’s on-call counseling services, is president of GU Pride.  Lloyd tells his story in detail in the Hoya here  and the story of the sentencing is here.  For both stories, the reactions in readers’ comments is interesting.  Lloyd's own potential legal issues are also disturbing (as he describes him);  I didn't realize resident assistants are "employees" and make enough money to pay for most of their expenses.  But that position means he would have a "conflict of interest" in speaking about any campus issue in social media.  
  
I find it rather shocking that someone could easily make a lethal toxin easily from a common vegetable product (castor "beans").  I would personally wonder how real the medical threat really had been.  I think back over some movies about Putin and the use of polonium – the first association in my mind.   Of course, that's a totally different substance which is hard to get a hold of. Still the idea of a connection between a gay student and what is depicted as potential bioterror or chemical weapon is startling. 
  
As for the dance, someone inserted a fluorescent pipe down my chest at the dance (that is, I was in the "got it" count).  When I got home, I found that the item made an interesting “skyscraper” for the “Chinese city” portion of my model railroad display.  You could turn off the lights and it was the only light in the living room.  Still, you can’t see it very well from another part of the display (of a fictitious alien colony on another planet) where the “abductees” (call the "The Proles") live. 
  

The Town did not open its new Patio last night.  But it really wasn’t that cold. 
  
Note: the second picture is the view of Georgetown I always got in the 1960s crossing Key Bridge on a bus (pre-Metro days) to go to George Washington University, after my 1961 expulsion from William and Mary for admitting "latent homosexuality".  

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Elaine Donnelly still on warpath regarding gender in the military


Think Progress has an important story, by Josh Israel. back in May 2014 about Elaine Donnelly, “The woman who has never stopped fighting to keep LGBT Americans out of the military,” link here. The article calls her a “Phyllis Schlafly Protégé”.   She is “credited” now with keeping the trans-gender ban alive.  But seriously, I am concerned that a GOP rout in Congress, and especially in 2016, could lead to the undoing of all we accomplished with the repeal of DADT in 2010 and 2011. 
  
The Washington Times has published a piece by Donnelly opposing “forcing women into combat”, here (she can characterize it as a “war on women”).  The fact that most men (including most gay men) have more upper body strength than most women (including most lesbians) seems indisputable, and formed an underpinning of the “moral climate” when I was growing up – men were supposed to take the risks to protect women and children, and all that became very double edged in my own mind.  The superior upper body strength applies even with relatively low body weight;  one does not need the mass of a football lineman to be “strong” (just look at some MLB pitchers for examples). 
  
Today, TWT published a bizarre story (by Rowan Scarborough) of Lt. Col. Christopher Downey, supposedly being disciplined with interfering with a PDA between two lesbian military members in a bar, and for interfering with someone else trying to photograph them, link here. The incidents seem to have happened around Ft. Drum, NY.  Photography in discos has become more nettlesome in the past few years because of social media concerns, as discussed here before. 


Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Marriage equality in the Palmetto State, where I took Army Basic in 1968


A federal judge has struck down the gay marriage ban in South Carolina.  The Charlotte Observer story is here.  The judge is Richard Gergel (the court is in Rhett Butler's Charleston).  The text of the opinion is here. The case sounds like an important “win” in the deep South, but the 4th Circuit had already ruled on this before.
   
While many of the arguments are based on equal protection, as that concept mixes with due process and the notion of fundamental rights, it’s apparent that “equality” is becoming even more important in resolving a fundamental rift in our society over individualism – when should an individual put others and the community over the self? 
   
In the past, anti-homosexual views and “heterosexism” were, in a sloppy or fuzzy sense, seen as related to the ability to build a relationship expressing complementarity, a concept more specific than psychological polarity and more directly related to openness to procreation, with all its uncertainties and risks.   Modernism has led to the view that you don’t need to base reaching out on gender complementarity, but you have to accept some other ideas or processes (like gay couples adopting children). Modernism has also led to a mixed view of gender equality within marriage, as with the controversy over paternity leave in the workplace.  
     
The notion that we have to respond to need that knocks on the door was behind a lot of my thinking on the military gay ban (before and including the 17-year-itch, that is, “don’t ask don’t tell”). Marriage equality in the 90s seemed much more distant.  Yet, the lack of it meant living with parity, not equality.  “Separate but equal” as always an oxymoron.  "S.C." is where I took Basic Combat Training when I was drafted in February 1968, Fort Jackson, just east of Columbia.  I remember that experience vividly. At night, as we buffed barracks floors, WCOS blared that it was first in "The Palmetto State".